Release efforts through Ministry of Justice : Murder allegation against Mouka Emmanuel
Barr. F.O Isichie is the state counsel assigned to the case by the Ministry of Justice. I met him during my first appearances at Umunede high court, Umunede. I engaged him and informed I’d send facts of the matter to him with evidence proving the state has nothing to prosecute. I did through the Keeper, Agbor Prison and my brothers, Samuel and Tino. He still opposed my bail and other efforts without cause or justification. I’ve spoken to him to drop the charge and he insists on a withdrawal without reason. The Ministry of Justice cannot prosecute the victim of robbery and assassination attempts.
Barr. F.O Isichie, State Counsel, Ministry Of Justice
Barr. F.O. Isichie, a seeming God fearing gentleman given his regular references to God in his speech and his WhatsApp profile bearing references to God, is the State counsel assigned to the case by the Ministry of Justice.
He is from Agbor Zone of the Ministry of Justice, Delta State. I’ve helped several persons who are also being prosecuted by him. A gentleman named Ogbe who claims the Obiaruku Bar and Agbor Bar are vested in his imprisonment unlawfully is being prosecuted by him. I’ve vested efforts to help him attain freedom regardless of the possible conspiracy to keep him imprisoned.
I have spoken to Barr. F.O. Isichie on multiple occasions, I emphasized my innocence as the reason for engagement and sent him these documents proving my innocence:
- Facts and evidences v3.*
- Request for withdrawal by Police and other authorities v3.pdf
- violations (1) “by Police to NHRC”.pdf
I sent a document address to Barr.F.O. Isichie, Ministry of Justice, as an official petition to him requesting he drop the charge on the basis of being deceitful, ridiculous, outrageous and accusatory to the victim of the attack in my own private premises. The letter i sent him is attached below.
Spoke to Barr.F.O Isichie, State Counsel, today, Dec 9, 2023. He states he was informed by DPP ‘s opinion to prosecute the case. I read the opinion, it does not state a charge or accuse me of a crime.
I informed him I have made continual efforts to inform him early before admitting evidence and counter-arguments against police falsification. I also informed him I have evidence that Happy Uboh was sick from his text messages to me on the same day before breaking into my premises.
These evidences contradict the claim of being shot which was written by police themselves as a falsified statement.
Barr.Isichie states he does not have investigative powers or power to receive my arguments, he argues that DPP does. I already sent him multiple copies of my arguments and I would argue that he has capacity to know the truth so as not to prosecute the victim of a robbery and assassination attempt wrongly.
I’ve asked him to provide the contacts of whoever has authority to review the facts before I admit them to the case at court. I’ll follow up on he doing that.
I also informed him that barr.agholor has stated a willingness by the complainants to withdraw in which Barr.Isichie states the complainants should reach him if they’re willing to withdraw. I expect barr.agholor to conclude that arrangement if they’re withdrawing while I’m insisting he should review my arguments early before I admit them into the case as evidence.